Larry Bolch
Two Considerations
There are two considerations in
becoming an artist—one objective and the other
subjective. Objectively, we learn our chosen
medium. For a poet, it is the written form of the
spoken language—generally one's mother tongue.
For a pianist, it is fingering, pedaling, time and
notation. For a photographer it is light and
colour, exposure, printing, presentation and all
the details that each entails. However an
intuitive understanding of the relationship
between film/sensor speed, shutter speed and lens
speed is just the beginning. While one may grow up
speaking the local language, it does not make one
a poet.
The art is created when the artist transcends
the medium and makes statements that communicate
with the recipient on a subjective level. In photo
competitions, it is not uncommon to see photos
being evaluated on their objective, rather than
their subjective merits. Many judges take the easy
way out, judging the grammar and syntax rather
than the impact of the message. So did a dry old
English teacher I had the pain of enduring all too
many years ago. She taught Shakespeare, not as
some of the most powerful and moving plays in the
English language, but material to be analyzed for
language only.
The beauty and drama was entirely lost on most
of the class. We all had to memorize a passage and
were marked only on the accuracy of our memories
for word and punctuation, not for the sensitivity
and understanding of the character we were playing.
In fact, it was fine just to simply write the
speech—which made it easier to grade. We could
get a perfect grade without an iota of
understanding of who the character was, what the
passage was expressing and how it fit into the
flow of the drama.
This is not in any way to say that learning the
nuts and bolts of photography is of little
relevance. Only when the poet is transcendently
fluent in the language, can great poetry be
written. It is almost pure luck if someone still
struggling with the basics of photography manages
to pull off a good picture. A photographer, who is
technically fluent and has the artistic talent,
will consistently produce fine work every shoot.
Occasionally brilliant, but the weakest work
produced is above a reasonably high threshold that
most would envy.
Furthermore, the technique will become more and
more invisible as fluency increases. I had the
privilege of studying stage lighting with one of
the great masters. He once said that if someone
comes up to you after the show and compliments you
on the lighting, you have failed. Great lighting
is so organic with the show that it should never
be seen as something apart from the drama. Great
photographic technique enhances the impact of the
image content, but never competes with it.
When one is fluent with the language of
photography, one is able to almost instinctively
set the camera for the situation one is
photographing. One does not think of a wide-angle
lens as a tool to get more into the frame, but
rather as a lens for subjectivity that lets one
inside the personal space of the subject. Likewise
a telephoto allows a much cooler and less involved
feeling.
Shoot a distant person in a crowd with a long
lens with a wide opening, with that person being
the only sharp subject in the frame for a feeling
of loneliness in a crowd. Compare that to the same
person, shot the same size with a super wide, and
the crowd and person are deeply entwined. Formal
portraits are generally shot with lenses in the
85mm to 135mm range. It puts enough distance that
formality is preserved. Environmental portraits
are shot with very short lenses, presenting the
subject in a very intimate, subjective way and
vividly relating the person to their surroundings.
It is through fluency that focal length takes on
an expressive meaning unrelated to photographing
cramped interiors or distant birds.
Becoming technically competent is only the
prerequisite to becoming a photographer. It is not
a goal in itself. It is also a pursuit that never
ends. Just as a concert pianist practices hours
for every minute spent in performance, so does a
photographer spend hours of testing and practice
for every minute spent on a shoot. It is simply
the way, no matter the medium.
While photography seems to be immensely "technical"
for many people, it is no more difficult to become
a photographer than it is to become a performing
musician, dancer or poet. All demand a reasonably
substantial investment in learning the medium and
constant practice to extend the knowledge and
skill with the language in order to have the
fluency to express the ever more profound.
Larry Bolch
Larry is a photographer, composer, and
multimedia poet who resides in Edmonton, Alberta.
You can read more of his writing and view his
photography at his Web site: larry-bolch.com.
|