Kevin Gulstene
The Dock Walker
Kevin
Gulstene is a thinker and that makes him rare
among men.
Besides the fact that his photography is
contemplative—you can see that in his work—he
seems to be in a continual state of pondering.
Accordingly it seems his cameras are never far
from his side, and although he will sometimes
agonize that digital photography is too easy or
too convenient he produces an unbroken array of
images that give us a glimpse of what his mind is
working away on.
Judging by what he keeps in his online gallery,
Gulstene is captivated by his surroundings.
Whether it be a steamy landscape taken in his
native British Columbia, or a simple object
study—the solitary simplicity of a soy sauce
bottle on a kitchen table; a bra on a bed—Gulstene
is constantly visually exploring his environment.
We caught up with Mr. Gulstene via telephone,
slowing him down just long enough to coax some
self-examination out of him, to see what makes him
tick. Turns out, he had as much to reveal about
himself as his work reveals about his state of
mind.
CoC: Are there any photographers whose work
inspires you?
KG: I'm inspired by a lot of photography. I don't 'get'
all of it, but I'm inspired by a wide range of
images and styles.
I've always loved B&W photography, so when
I started I was, naturally, inundated by examples
of Adams, Weston and the F64 crew. Their prints
are masterfully done, and I spent much of the
first year immersing myself in technical details
and the zone system and a very structured approach
to photography. But, I never really connected with
their images or that style of photography. I can
still drool a little at the printing quality but,
in the end, for me they were masterfully done
boring images.
Rolf Horn was
the first photographer that I drew real
inspiration from. He was a transition from the F64
stuff to work that I enjoy now. I still love his
work and always will. He's a gifted photographer
and a brilliant printer. In fact, it was looking
at an example of him printing a negative that it
clicked for me just how much of the magic in a BW
print is created in the dark room and not in the
camera. It was like an Archimedes moment when I
saw the crappy negative he started with and the
print he ended with. From that day forward I was
never disappointed with the negative that I got as
long as I could see my way to a print that looked
the way I felt when I released the shutter.
Michael
Kenna is my all time favourite photographer.
Hands down. End of story. His images are usually
simple compositions with strong graphic elements.
I can look at them for a long, long time.
There are a few others in this vein: Ron
Van Dongen and Seamus
A Ryan for the simple large format
plants; Chip
Forelli; David
Fokos.
There is another style that I love as well. It
uses textures and extremely shallow depth of field
to focus attention on the key elements of the
composition. Mark
Tucker is the master of this style for me.
Last, but definitely not least is Keith
Carter for some more edgy and sometimes dark
images. His "Holding Venus" book still
stops me dead in my tracks.
CoC: What was the one thing that drew you to
making pictures?
KG: A slippery slope.
I bought a Nikon N80 on the way back to the
hospital after our second daughter was born
because I wanted to get better pictures than the
plastic point-and-shoot we had at the time.
Then I would get captivated by some of the
images that came back. Not just the usual "my
daughter's the prettiest baby in the world"
kind of captivated but some just had a visual hold
on me.
The more I work at it the more I recognize that
simple graphic images are the ones I connect to
most.
CoC: If money were no object, would you shoot
full time?
KG: Are you kidding? If I had no other obligations
I'd put a dark room and a light room in the back
of a big-ass Airstream trailer, and I'd spend the
next three years travelling around Canada and the
US taking pictures and printing them. Ideally, my
wife would come with me and fulfill her empty
threat to "carry your cameras and be your
muse"; it's probably a little much to hope
for.
CoC: Are you self-educated as a photographer?
KG: Yes. I had a camera in high school and I took
the usual visual arts B&W semester but other
than that and one abortive attempt at attending a
class last year I've muddled my way through on my
own.
I'd like to be a little elitist about that and
pretend that you can figure it all out yourself if
you want to, but I'm not sure being self-taught is
a wholly good thing. I can do what I can do but I
think that to get to the next level, I'm going to
have to look for some more insight into the
creative process. It's still a little hit and
miss. I've considered doing a Bachelor of Fine
Arts to fill in the enormous gaps in my
understanding but at 45 I'm a little leery of the
self-indulgent 'I'm trying to find my vision' kind
of thinking that seems so prevalent.
CoC: Do you have a mentor or a
friend with the same interest?
KG: No. Wish I did.
CoC: Do your kids pick up the
camera?
KG: My older daughter is quite creative and does
really nice work without much effort but it
doesn't do much for her. The 5 year-old is like a
big Labrador puppy and isn't really allowed closer
that 3 feet to the cameras. Well, actually she has
a little Canon Canonette that she wanders around
with that keeps her paws off of the expensive gear.
CoC: Does your wife understand your
hobby?
KG: Yes, kinda. She has been known to complain
about being a camera widow but she's very
supportive. Actually I think she's so damn
grateful that I'm primarily responsible for
raising the kids that anything that keeps me happy
with that role is pretty cool with her.
CoC: Are there any photographers in
your extended family?
KG: My brother makes some nice images; he's also a
B& W nut and my great uncle Nicholais ran
around the homestead in Saskatchewan in the late
1800s and early 1900s making glass plate negatives
of family, friends and tractors.
CoC: Whose side of the family do you
credit for your artistic side?
KG: That's a little tough actually. My dad can
produce some very nice pen and ink drawings; very
precise, very well done. As a painter, my mom was
less structured, more intuitive. I think I took a
little from each of them although it requires more
effort for me to be structured now; which is odd
for an engineer I suppose. It tends to rely more
on an intuitive approach now. It's a kind of
quiet, heightened awareness.
CoC: Whose side of the family do
you get your competitive streak from?
KG: Don't know. Random collision of genes probably.
I am incredibly competitive but not in a way
that is obvious to a lot of people. It's a mild
dysfunction in that I think it sometimes gets in
the way of seeing the world around me but, truth
be told, I enjoy it. I think some of the Buddhist
teachings help bring competitiveness into better
alignment. It's not that competitiveness is
inherently bad or good: you need to look at your
motivations at the time to better understand
whether or not you're acting properly.
Playing sports, or business for that matter,
would not be any fun if you were not going all-out
to win. That is the purpose of the sport: to
compete whole-heartedly within the rules. But if
you're motivation is wrong, if it is not the
spirit of competition and love of the sport but a
need to feel superior at others' expense or if you
invest too much of your self-image in winning then
you're no longer acting properly.
CoC: You live on the West Coast, a
place that lends itself to year-round beauty.
Does that opportunity fill you with glee or
dread?
KG: We lived in Sydney Australia, a truly beautiful
place, and Chicago, a much less beautiful place,
for a decade before returning to Canada and
landing in BC. In all honesty, I think BC is the
greatest place on the planet. It's safe, it's
prosperous by almost any standard, it has
mountains, it has the ocean, it has a temperate
climate and it has wilderness left (wilderness is
when you have to travel more that a day to find
the nearest RV park).
We are very fortunate and live in a part of
North Vancouver with a view of English Bay, Lions
Gate Bridge and our back yard is, literally, a
forest.
Glee is the only way to describe how I feel
about BC and the photo opportunities here. To date
I haven't made as much of the opportunity as I
might have but I have three projects on the go or
planned right now. A large format B&W project
on the west coast of Vancouver Island, the start
of an ongoing project to document pristine
wilderness (colour) and a long exposure LF
waterfront project that I've been plotting since I
got here.
Seriously, we are all very lucky to live in
Canada. Most of us have no idea how lucky we are.
CoC: You lived a typical two-income
life and then left it all behind to raise your
two girls, whom you refer to as the 'best
girls on earth'. What did that sudden new
reality do for your photography?
KG: Well, it created the opportunity. Literally.
There was no real photography to speak of while I
was working. It was the stereotypical drill: 50 to
70 hours a week working, a lot of it overseas or
out of town in the later years. After getting the
driveway shovelled, the bills paid and some time
with the family there wasn't any time, or energy,
for photography. So, in a real way, unplugging
from the two-income programme created the
opportunity to do any photography at all.
Without the pressure of work life and
professional objectives there is lot more time for
reflection. It's a very humanizing experience to
have spare intellectual time on your hands and to
actually be a responsible adult at home and not
just the best horse-back-ride-giver. So, in that
your photography reflects the way you see the
world, it changed my photographs. They are much
less stressed, less angsty and less angry.
CoC: You've said that there is a
place of 'quiet awareness' that you go to when
you're making your best pictures, that you
become focused on all of the minutiae one
typically misses in the daily grind. Is this
spontaneous, or can you go there when you need
to?
KG: Quiet awareness is the best way I have to
describe it. It's an unhurried way of looking at
things; shape and form become much more obvious.
This may sound odd but it's similar to the way my
mind gets when I'm in the shower or when I'm just
about to fall asleep: your thinking is more
relaxed, less rigid, it's also more logical but at
an intuitive level not logical in the linear
plodding way it is when you force it to be.
I'm much better at doing that spontaneously now.
I take a few deep breaths, try and clear the
clutter of thoughts that are always clamouring for
attention and spend a few minutes moving
physically slower and focusing all my attention on
what I'm doing. If it's loading film, then all of
my attention is on the film, the shape of the
canister the smooth metal film rails of the camera
back, just getting absorbed in the task. It sounds
a little new-age wonky but a few minutes of this
really helps me.
CoC: You have a background in
Information Technology. Has this in any way
helped your photography and your transition to
digital photography?
KG: I'm an electrical engineer by education and
worked with software and IT projects pretty much
from university on. I'd have to say that made the
accoutrements of digital photography second
nature. I remember having to work out how much
charge a charge coupled device (CCD) element could
hold and leakage rates and all kinds of horrible
things so I understand the technology.
CoC: Your competitive nature: Does
this play at all when you're making images?
KG: No, it's a bad habit. I have to put it in a
box.
CoC: If you were offered a job
tomorrow as a photographer -a hired gun- and
it didn't interfere with your life as a
full-time dad, would you take it?
KG: Hmmm, if I had to make a living doing it then,
no I probably wouldn't. If it were a 'fine-art'
kind of gig then I'd leap at it. I think that to
make a living as a photographer you have to shoot
weddings, or do product or food shots. I think it
would change photography from the fulfilling thing
it is today to something else. Something less. I'm
sure there are thousands of people who make a
living doing photography they don't like, so they
can afford to do the photography that they do like,
but I don't think it would work for me.
CoC: You have a deep appreciation
for black and white photography. Describe that,
and how you view the medium.
KG: Ack, I've saved this question for last because
it's the hardest to answer. Good B&W
photography is enthralling for me. I can sit a
look at good B&W for hours.
There is a quote I heard somewhere that said:
if you take a picture of someone in colour you
take a picture of their clothes; if you take the
picture in B&W you take a picture of their
soul. When it's done well, that is absolutely true.
Great B&W photography is what I'm heading
for; what I'm trying to do. A lot of what I do
casually is colour because it's easier to make a
decent colour image than a decent B&W image
and most people like colour photos.
Images in B& W are not distracted by colour.
They must have content. Obviously, some images
only work in colour; that's not what I'm talking
about.
CoC: On a recent trip to San
Francisco you agonized over taking a full
digital kit and a basic film kit. You
ultimately chose film. Why?
KG: I flip-flop on the question of carrying film or
digital all the time. Film and digital feel
different to me. It's odd, but film and digital
feel a little different when I'm shooting. The
same way I look at things differently whether the
camera has B&W or colour film in it. It's
dopey, but it's real.
I suppose for the most part it's just an
indulgence. You can make great images with either
and you can make good B&W from colour too if
you have some Photoshop skills.
I credit digital for a year of rapid learning.
There is nothing like the instant turnaround that
digital cameras provide. Looking at the back of
the camera and the histogram just after the taking
the photo is much better feedback than taking
notes, bracketing and waiting to finish the roll,
have it processed and then scanning it. It is a
phenomenal teaching tool.
But, having said that, I find at times that I
rely on the feedback and don't really think enough
about the image and exposure when I have the D100
around my neck. Slowing down a little, thinking
about the exposure, the meter reading, the
composition usually makes a better photo. So, many
times I pick film to make myself think a little
more.
CoC: You
said on your site: "photography is
good for the soul". What has it done for
yours?
KG: Photography is good for the soul. I think
modern life is incredible complicated, much more
complicated than at any time in history. There is
pressure to consume, pressure to achieve career
goals, pressure to 'succeed', pressure to get the
kids in the right schools in the right
neighbourhood. The news is filled with dread and
what goes for entertainment now is often either
emotionally searing or mind-numbingly formulaic
and banal.
Photography is great way to unplug from all
that. It is peaceful, for the most part solitary,
and it's a craft. You get to create something with
your own skills that is unique.
Along the same lines about a year and a half
ago we disconnected almost all the cable channels,
moved the TV to the basement and made a few other
changes to put a little more family back in the
family. More reading, more books, more yoga (OK,
well no yoga for me 'cause I get tired of the Pooh
Bear jokes) less Hollywood, less violence and less
agro.
CoC: You're a self-described gear
head. You've had a Nikon F80, a Lieca M6, a
Yashicamat 124G, and a Shen Hoa 4x5. You no
longer have the Leica. If you could do it all
over again, would you have kept the Leica? Are
there any other cameras you wish you still had?
KG: Oh, I gave the F80 to my brother and got an
F100 just before the San Francisco trip.
Yeah, it's a little like alternating between
film and digital. For me there is a certain
feeling that you get from a certain tool. I know
that an M6 can't really take better images than an
F100 but there is a feeling you get from holding
and using a really fine piece of machinery like
that.
Sometimes all that stuff gets in the way though.
I have a backpack that I can put all the 35 mm
stuff in and tie a tripod to. I'll have everything
I need: a flash, a long zoom, a short zoom, a
general purpose zoom, four fixed focal length
lenses and batteries and filters and all kinds of
other essential stuff. While it's nice to have
what you need should the image of a lifetime show
up, I now think that mostly all the time spent
thinking about what equipment to use isn't
necessarily productive.
When I was in these minimalist moods I used to
take the Leica out with a 50mm Summicron and just
use that for a while. I do miss that camera. Never,
ever sell a Leica; it's like selling your sister,
except you miss it more.
Right now I am fighting the dangerous
possibility that I'll convince myself I need a
Hasselblad 501cm. Wish me luck.
CoC: How long have you published
your photography online?
KG: I've put my photos online for about a year and
a half. I had a 'blog' (we don't mention it
anymore) for a while. It started out as a
political blog and a safe place to rant a bit.
Later it evolved, and at one point I wanted to
make it a clearinghouse for a number of efforts:
writing, photography, and environmental research.
I lost interest in the political stuff and left it
for a while.
I resurrected the photos and created a new site
that is much like a photoblog, at least it has
regular photos posted to it. I think that will
stay for a while, but I do have a short attention
span and I like to cycle between things: kind of
like the film/digital and minimalist/gearhead
phases.
CoC: You run a photoblog, a form of
Weblog. By their nature, Weblogs are more
popular if they're updated frequently. Do you
ever feel like a slave to the machine?
KG: Nope. When I was writing the political stuff (I like
to call it analysis but others would probably call
that an overbilling) I felt enormous pressure to
produce something good every day. I think this is
not unusual for self-publishing. There is a
toe-in-the-water phase followed by bolder and
bolder style, followed by pressure to attract
readers/viewers and be more creative/controversial/insightful
than the previous day followed by burnout.
It's funny but I knew all this when I started
the second site and still, I got sucked in a bit.
I wanted to get the site in front of some people.
No one likes putting their stuff in an empty
gallery at the end of a dead end street, so I did
the http://photoblogs.org/ registration.
Then I did the usual things needed to attract
some attention: read and comment on other peoples
sites, update regularly with good material,
referrer spam, the whole nine yards. This time it
only lasted a couple of weeks until reason set in
again.
Now it is just what it should be. It's a site
that I update regularly with whatever it is I'm
doing and thinking at the time. If people visit
great; if they don't that fine too. Besides, I can
always count on my mother-in-law to visit and give
me good feedback; she has great taste.
CoC: What advice would you give to
a photographer who might just now be looking
at the Weblog/Photoblog scene for the first
time?
KG: Figure out what your goals are first. Think
carefully. Treat everything you do and say online
the same way you would a customer or friend. The
relative anonymity of online publishing can be
seductive and lots of people say things they would
not normally say. Often, not always, but often
there is some regret, so make sure you are
comfortable with what you publish online.
Probably the best advice would be: be honest.
Do things that are meaningful to you at the time.
An interesting characteristic of the Internet is
that it rewards honesty of opinion almost at much
as it rewards flatulent fools; which is to say, a
lot.
CoC: Do online photography groups'
forums, or discussion forums have any appeal
or benefit to you?
KG: No. I only look at one.
CoC: I feel a rant coming on, or at
least a critiquing of a medium that needs it.
KG: No rant. I just don't find them useful enough
to frequent very often.
Many of the online forums suffer from the usual
problems of online forums-participants with
inadequate self-discipline and teeny tiny
cognitive ability-and that makes them difficult to
wade through. I've actually seen people threaten
each other with legal action and invitations to
"settle this in the alley". Who knew
chromatic aberration was such a hot button issue
for people?
More seriously, I do have lots of browser
bookmarks for online galleries, personal sites,
and online magazines, but the discussion forums
almost never talk about what interests me most:
the motivation of photography, how people pursue
their visions, story telling. The right brain side
of photography is much more interesting than the
technical details.
by Raymond A. van der Woning
Ray is a freelance writer,
Web designer, and photographer who lives in
Edmonton, Alberta. You can view his photography at photographi.ca.
|